Xuenou > Movies > 29 Movies Quentin Tarantino Doesn’t Like, from ‘Atomic Blonde’ to ‘1917’
29 Movies Quentin Tarantino Doesn’t Like, from ‘Atomic Blonde’ to ‘1917’
29 Movies Quentin Tarantino Doesn't Like, from 'Atomic Blonde' to '1917',Which films does Quentin Tarantino hate? Movies the director doesn't like, including Twin Peaks, The Matrix, Hunger Games, and Monty Python.

29 Movies Quentin Tarantino Doesn’t Like, from ‘Atomic Blonde’ to ‘1917’

Love him or hate him, what Quentin Tarantino has achieved over his more than 30 years of filmmaking is inarguably impressive. Not only is the “Reservoir Dogs” writer/director a renowned auteur — nominated three times for the Best Director Oscar with two Best Original Screenplay wins for “Pulp Fiction” and “Django Unchained” — Tarantino is also a well-versed film critic whose encyclopedic knowledge of other artists’ filmographies precedes him.

Living in Los Angeles, the “Pulp Fiction” director famously began his journey to cinematic rock star status as an employee at the Video Archives rental store in Manhattan Beach: since closed, rebuilt in Tarantino’s basement, and turned into a podcast he hosts with longtime friend and collaborator Roger Avary. It was in the bygone era of rewindable tapes that Tarantino cut his critical teeth: combing through the store’s collection, full of everything from black-and-white classics to straight-to-TV sci-fi specials.

A famed borrower (or appropriator, depending on your viewpoint), Tarantino pulls liberally from the movies he likes to inspire his work; see the Blaxploitation tropes in “Jackie Brown” and the samurai films channeled in the “Kill Bill” duology. The writer/director’s favorites are well-documented for this reason. IndieWire previously rounded up dozens of the filmmaker’s go-to recommendations, from John Carpenter’s “The Thing” to Brian De Palma’s “Blowout.”

Though he’s shared fewer of them, the movies Tarantino doesn’t like have also piqued audience interest. Over the years, the cinephile has lambasted a wide array of esteemed competing directors, including John Ford (Tarantino dubbed his westerns “overrated”) and Stanley Kubrick (whom Tarantino has said is a “hypocrite” for his stance on depicting violence). Last summer on his podcast, Tarantino even called Ed Wood and François Truffaut “bumbling amateurs,” which, you know, fair maybe.

Tarantino tends to speak about film history and trends in general terms, so it’s less common for him to name specific titles he didn’t enjoy. But when he does, the “Cinema Speculation” author really lets it fly.

Compiled from interviews and news stories throughout Tarantino’s career, the following list contains 29 films (well, 28 films and one prestige TV show) the writer/director reportedly does not recommend: be it because he considers the films themselves to be bad or because the circumstances surrounding their releases left Tarantino feeling sour.

Featuring a notable number of sequels — and a couple of fringe cases Tarantino didn’t wholesale dismiss, but only liked parts of — the following selections are listed in no particular order. They range from Sam Mendes’ Academy Award winner “1917” to action blockbusters like the Charlize Theron-starring “Atomic Blonde” to classic comedies such as Ivan Reitman’s “Stripes” and the Alfred Hitchcock flick “Frenzy.”

[Editor’s note: This article was first published in December 2022 and has been updated multiple times since.]

  • “A Clockwork Orange” (1971)

    A FORBIDDEN ORANGE, (aka LA NARANJA PROHIBIDA), Malcolm McDowell, in scene from A CLOCKWORK ORANGE, 1971, 2021. © Turner Classic Movies /Courtesy Everett Collection
    Image Credit: Courtesy Everett Collection

    Unlike a lot of the movies Tarantino has taken potshots at over the years, the director actually does have respect for “A Clockwork Orange”: Stanley Kubrick’s famously brutal film about an eloquent sociopath’s forced rehabilitation. In a 2003 interview with The New Yorker, Tarantino referred to the dystopian film’s first 20 minutes, during which Alex (Malcolm McDowell) engages in horifically violent crimes, as “pretty fucking perfect.”

    But Tarantino is fairly cold towards Kubrick’s work in general, and he went on to complain that the remainder of the film was a “hypocritical” work from the legend: “His party line was, ‘I’m not making a movie about violence, I’m making a movie against violence.’ And it’s just, like, ‘Get the fuck off. I know and you know your dick was hard the entire time you were shooting those first twenty minutes. You couldn’t keep it in your pants the entire time you were editing it and scoring it. You liked the rest of the movie, but you put up with the rest of the movie.'” 

  • “Selma” (2014)

    SELMA, from left: Stephan James, Trai Byers, Wendell Pierce, David Oyelowo, as Martin Luther King Jr., 2014. ph: Atsushi Nishijima/©Paramount Pictures/Courtesy Everett Collection
    Image Credit: ©Paramount/Courtesy Everett Collection

    Tarantino’s comments about “Selma” are a bit of an odd case, as he later offered a sort-of apology, and said he never actually saw the movie. But during a 2015 interview with author Bret Easton Ellis for T Magazine, the director seemed to give a backhanded compliment to Ava DuVernay’s film about the 1965 voting rights marches: “She did a really good job on ‘Selma’ but ‘Selma’ deserved an Emmy.” 

    After his comment attracted backlash, Tarantino released a statement to IndieWire claiming that he never saw actually saw “Selma,” despite the quote, and that him claiming it should get an Emmy was “more like a question.” 

    “Which basically meant, ‘it’s like a TV movie?'” Tarantino wrote in his statement to IndieWire. “Which Bret and myself being from the same TV generation, was not only understood, but there was no slam intended. Both Bret and myself come from the seventies and eighties when there were a lot of historically based TV movies: the King mini-series written by Abby Mann starring Paul Winfield; ‘Crisis at Central High’ with Joanne Woodward. And ‘Judge Horton and the Scottsboro Boys.’ These were great TV movies. I’d be honored to be placed next to those films. However, I haven’t seen it. Does it look like a seventies TV movie? Yes. Does it play like one, I don’t know, I haven’t seen it.”

  • “North By Northwest” (1959)

    NORTH BY NORTHWEST, Cary Grant, 1959
    Image Credit: Courtesy Everett Collection

    After the T Magazine interview ran, Ellis posted an unedited version of the piece on his official website; it has since been removed, but remains archived on the Wayback Machine. One section cut from the printed piece but included in Ellis’ draft sees him offer his hot takes on several films, both classics and new releases. 

    During a discussion of Alfred Hitchcock’s work, Tarantino admitted that he’s not a fan of the master of suspense’s ouevre. In particular, he was dismissive of his 1959 suspense classic “North By Northwest,” which starred Cary Grant as a man on the run after getting caught in a conspiracy.

    “People discover ‘North by Northwest’ at 22 and think it’s wonderful when actually it’s a very mediocre movie,” Tarantino said. 

  • “Vertigo” (1958)

    VERTIGO, Kim Novak, 1958
    Image Credit: Courtesy Everett Collection

    “Vertigo” is probably Hitchcock’s most universally acclaimed feature; it topped the 2012 Sight and Sound Critics Poll of the all-time best films, and is ranked 2nd on the 2022 poll. But in the unedited Ellis interview, Tarantino admitted he doesn’t like the seminal thriller — in fact, he’s not a fan of any of Hitchcock’s ’50s output. 

    “They have the stink of the 50s which is similar to the stink of the 80s,” Tarantino said. 

  • “Rushmore” (1998)

    RUSHMORE, Jason Schwartzman, Olivia Williams, 1998, (c)Buena Vista Pictures/courtesy Everett Collection
    Image Credit: ©Buena Vista Pictures/Courtesy Everett Collection

    In the unedited Ellis interview, Tarantino expressed mixed opinions about the films of Wes Anderson; he said he loved the Texas filmmaker’s debut “Bottle Rocket” and liked “The Grand Budapest Hotel,” but didn’t enjoy his beloved 1998 dramedy “Rushmore.” That film stars Jason Schwartzman as an eccentric private academy student, and Tarantino said his issue with the film was that he couldn’t connect with its lead.  

    “I never thought ‘Rushmore’ was as funny as everybody else did because I didn’t like Max,” Tarantino said. 

  • “The Man From U.N.C.L.E” (2015)

    THE MAN FROM U.N.C.L.E., l-r: Henry Cavill, Alicia Vikander, 2015. ph: Daniel Smith/©Warner Bros. Pictures/courtesy Everett Collection
    Image Credit: ©Warner Bros/Courtesy Everett Collection

    Aside from the classics and critically acclaimed indies that Tarantino weighed in on for the unedited Ellis interview, he also shared his take on a then extremely recent release: Guy Ritchie’s 2015 film reboot of spy TV show “The Man From U.N.C.L.E.” While Tarantino liked the first half of the action flick, he said the film’s second half fell apart.  

     “The first half was really funny and terrific but in the whole second half I’m like, ‘Oh, wait a minute, we were supposed to care about the bomb? What the fuck is going on here? I was supposed to pay attention to the stupid story?’”

    He also didn’t care for Alicia Vikander’s performance in the film as the female lead. “Henry Cavill was fantastic but I didn’t like the girl at all,” he said.

  • “Monty Python’s The Meaning of Life” (1983)

    MONTY PYTHON'S THE MEANING OF LIFE, Terry Jones, 1983, (c) Universal/courtesy Everett Collection
    Image Credit: ©Universal/Courtesy Everett Collection

    Tarantino never said he outright hates “The Meaning of Life,” Monty Python’s 1983 sketch film, but he did share that it was one of the films that made him the most uncomfortable while watching.  

    Specifically, in 2004, the director revealed to the Irish Examiner that “The Autumn Years,” a sketch where director Terry Jones plays a man that continously vomits, is one of the only film scenes he can’t stand to watch.   

    “The only time I’ve ever had to look away, because I couldn’t bear to watch, was ‘The Meaning Of Life,’ when that fat bastard keeps being sick,” Tarantino said. “I felt really nauseous – it was just too much. I was looking around and I thought, ‘If anyone here is sick and I have to smell vomit, I’m going to hurl’. I just about held onto my lunch in the end, but I still can’t think about that scene without retching.”

  • “Frenzy” (1972)

    FRENZY, Barbara Leigh-Hunt, 1972
    Image Credit: Courtesy Everett Collection

    Tarantino dedicates a full chapter of “Cinema Speculation” to Brian De Palma’s 1972 psychological thriller “Sisters.” He compares De Palma to numerous contemporary filmmakers in his analysis, taking a snide swipe at Alfred Hitchcock’s “Frenzy”: a crime thriller starring Jon Finch also from 1972. 

    “While De Palma liked making thrillers (for a little while, at least), I doubt he loved watching them,” Tarantino said. “Hitchcockian thrillers were for him a means to an end. That’s why when he was forced to return to the genre in the mid-eighties, they were so lackluster. Ultimately he resented having to make them and was bored with the form. Hitchcock’s ‘Frenzy’ might be a piece of crap, but I doubt Alfred was bored making it.” 

  • “Quintet” (1979)

    QUINTET, from left, Paul Newman, Fernando Rey, 1979, TM & Copyright ©20th Century Fox Film Corp./courtesy Everett Collection
    Image Credit: Courtesy Everett Collection

    Reflecting on theater outings that impacted his childhood for “Cinema Speculation,” Tarantino recalled a double-feature his parents, uncle, and babysitter once attended as a double date. He slams two Robert Altman movies along the way.

    “The evening was not a success,” Tarantino said. “Not only did they not like the two movies, my stepfather and uncle proceeded to bitch about them for days after. ‘Brewster’ McCloud is one of the worst movies to ever carry a studio logo, and that’s fully acknowledging Altman also made ‘Quintet’ for a studio as well. ‘Quintet’ is just terrible, boring, and pointless.”

  • “True Detective” (HBO, 2014-present)

    "True Detective"
    Image Credit: HBO

    Yes, “True Detective” is a TV show, not a film. But that didn’t stop Tarantino from giving his two cents about the show in a 2015 interview with New York Magazine, where he revealed he watched the first episode of the anthology’s first season before giving up. 

    “I tried to watch the first episode of season one, and I didn’t get into it at all. I thought it was really boring,” Tarantino told New York Mag. “And season two looks awful. Just the trailer — all these handsome actors trying to not be handsome and walking around looking like the weight of the world is on their shoulders. It’s so serious, and they’re so tortured, trying to look miserable with their mustaches and grungy clothes.”

    That said, Tarantino isn’t a full-on anti-TV snob. During the same interview, he revealed that he watched “Justified” and “How I Met Your Mother,” and revealed that his favorite HBO show was, surprisingly, Aaron Sorkin’s “The Newsroom:” “That was the only show that I literally watched three times. I would watch it at seven o’clock on Sunday, when the new one would come on. Then after it was over, I’d watch it all over again. Then I would usually end up watching it once during the week, just so I could listen to the dialogue one more time.” 

  • “Brewster McCloud” (1970)

    BREWSTER MCCLOUD, Rene Auberjonois, 1970
    Image Credit: Courtesy Everett Collection

    In the same passage from “Cinema Speculation,” Tarantino continues, “But ‘Brewster McCloud’ is the cinematic equivalent of a bird shitting on your head. Nevertheless, it’s kind of amusing imagining my parents, and my young uncle, and my seventeen-year-old babysitter buying a ticket to ‘Brewster McCloud’ and expecting to see a real movie.” 

  • “The 400 Blows” (1959)

    THE 400 BLOWS, (aka LES QUATRE CENTS COUPS), Claire Maurier, Jean-Pierre Leaud, Albert Remy, 1959.
    Image Credit: Jerry Tavin/Everett Collection

    As revealed on the Video Archives podcast, Tarantino isn’t a fan of François Truffaut. The French New Wave director came up during a discussion of his contemporary Claude Chabrol (in an episode from August 2022). 

    “[Chabrol’s] thrillers are drastically better than the abysmal Truffaut-Hitchcock movies, which I think are just awful,” Tarantino said. “I’m not a Truffaut fan that much anyway. There are some exceptions, the main one being ‘The Story of Adele H.’ But for the most part, I feel about Truffaut like I feel about Ed Wood. I think he’s a very passionate, bumbling amateur.”

    Tarantino’s distaste for Truffaut is reinforced by the novelization of his ninth film, “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood.” Although Tarantino has said hero Cliff Booth’s film opinions are not necessarily reflective of his own, one passage seems to reflect the director-turned-narrator’s sincere feelings.

    “He tried Truffaut twice, but he didn’t respond to him,” Tarantino wrote in the novel. “Not because the films were boring (they were), but that wasn’t the only reason Cliff didn’t respond. The first two films he watched (in a Truffaut double feature) just didn’t grab him. The first film, ‘The 400 Blows,’ left him cold. He really didn’t understand why that little boy did half the shit he did.”

  • “Jules and Jim” (1962)

    JULES AND JIM, (aka JULES ET JIM), l-r: Henri Serre, Jeanne Moreau on British poster art, 1962.
    Image Credit: Courtesy Everett Collection

    In addition to slamming “The 400 Blows,” Cliff Booth takes a hard stance on “Jules and Jim”: Truffaut’s 1962 romantic tragedy set against World War I, starring Jeanne Moreau, Oskar Werner, and Henri Serre. “He thought the mopey dopes in ‘Jules and Jim’ were a fucking drag,” Tarantino wrote in the “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood” novel.

    “Pulp Fiction” fans have suggested that Samuel L. Jackson’s character Jules and Tarantino’s cameo character Jimmy are references to Truffaut’s work. Tarantino has not confirmed this.

  • “1917” (2019)

    1917, (aka NINETEEN SEVENTEEN), far left: George MacKay, 2019. ph: Francois Duhamel / © Universal Pictures / courtesy Everett Collection
    Image Credit: ©Universal/Courtesy Everett Collection

    Appearing alongside Judd Apatow on the podcast “Club Random with Bill Maher,” Tarantino criticized Sam Mendes’ World War I epic “1917.” It competed against “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood” during the 2019 awards season, a fact Tarantino was quick to point out when Maher said the film ought to have “won all the awards.” 

    “You’re too impressed by that!” Tarantino remarked of Maher’s effusive compliments on Mendes’ use of one-shot takes. Tarantino argued the film used too many invisible cuts that should have instead been consolidated. “I’m not saying they do a bad job of that… But if you’re going to do it, really fucking do it. Go 15 minutes per fucking take.”

    He continued, “I actually liked the movie, but my friend brought something up, and oh my god, once he brought it up I couldn’t unhear it. He was complaining about it because he felt it played too much like a video game. Now, I don’t play video games, so I don’t feel that per se. So [watching the film], I’m actually thinking it feels more innovative than maybe someone who plays video games does. But the person I was speaking to said, ‘It’s ‘Wolfenstein’ the movie.'”

    “There’s this famous Nazi-werewolf game called ‘Wolfenstein,'” Tarantino laughed. “It’s like ‘Wolfenstein’ the movie, but I’d like it better if it was ‘Wolfenstein’ the movie.” 

  • “Atomic Blonde” (2017)

    ATOMIC BLONDE, Charlize Theron, 2017. ph: Jonathan Prime. ©Focus Features/courtesy Everett Collection
    Image Credit: Focus Features/courtesy Everett Collection

    While (negatively) reviewing “1917” on Bill Maher’s podcast in December 2022, Tarantino also took aim at the Charlize Theron-starring action flick “Atomic Blonde.”

    “When I’m watching like the long fight in ‘Atomic Blonde,’ I’m like, ‘God. This is amazing! This is fucking amazing! OK… wait a minute, no,” he said. “‘The shot took a shit. The shot’s not going on this long, it took a shit.’ So it’s all tainted. It’s all tainted. Because obviously, they didn’t carry it through.”

  • “Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me” (1992)

    TWIN PEAKS: FIRE WALK WITH ME, Grace Zabriskie, Sheryl Lee, Ray Wise, 1992, (c)New Line Cinemas/courtesy Everett Collection
    Image Credit: ©New Line Cinema/Courtesy Everett Collection

    In a 1992 interview for LA Weekly (h/t Far Out), Tarantino spoke about maintaing a balanced relationship with studios. He cautioned against cozying up to big companies, but added: “If all you do is these little art films for 10 years for a million or two dollars, you’re going to climb up your own ass.”

    He contined: “I’m not ragging on other people, but after I saw ‘Twin Peaks — Fire Walk With Me’ at Cannes, David Lynch has disappeared so far up his own ass that I have no desire to see another David Lynch movie until I hear something different. And you know, I loved him. I loved him.”

  • “Natural Born Killers” (1994)

    NATURAL BORN KILLERS, Woody Harrelson, 1994. © Warner Bros./Courtesy Everett Collection
    Image Credit: ©Warner Bros/Courtesy Everett Collection

    Though Tarantino wrote the script for Oliver Stone’s “Natural Born Killers” (an infamously dicey situation that left bad feelings on a few fronts), he still hasn’t be able to watch the movie from start to end. The screenwriter has lamented that Stone fundamentally misunderstood his story, rewriting portions that made the film’s characters unbelievable to Tarantino. 

    “One of the things about that script, in particular, was that I was trying to make it on the page,” he said on The Moment podcast in 2021 (h/t Slash Film). “So when you read it, you saw the movie. And it’s like why didn’t [Stone] do at least half of that? It was done for him!”

  • “Scream” (1996)

    SCREAM, Courteney Cox, Jamie Kennedy, Neve Campbell, 1996, (c) Dimension/courtesy Everett Collection
    Image Credit: ©Dimension Films/Courtesy Everett Collection

    Wes Craven’s 1996 slasher-turned-horror juggernaut “Scream” was and is widely regarded as one of the best scary movies ever made. And yet, Tarantino once argued the classic, starring Neve Campbell, Courteney Cox, and David Arquette, didn’t go far enough. 

    “I actually didn’t care for Wes Craven’s direction of it,” the filmmaker told Vulture in 2015. “I thought he was the iron chain attached to its ankle that kept it earthbound and stopped it from going to the Moon.”

  • “The Town” (2010)

    THE TOWN, from left: Ben Affleck, Jeremy Renner, 2010. Ph: Claire Folger/©Warner Brothers/courtesy Everett Collection
    Image Credit: Claire Folger/Warner Bros/Courtesy Everett Collection

    Ben Affleck’s 2010 crime thriller is something of an outlier on this list, considering Tarantino specifically said he liked the film. But in a 2015 interview with Vulture (the same one in which he discussed “Scream”), the writer/director aired a specific complaint he had with the film’s “phony” casting.

    “‘The Fighter’ had impeccable casting,” he said. “As an example, I really liked ‘The Town,’ which also came out in 2010. It was a good crime film. However, next to ‘The Fighter’, it just couldn’t hold up, because everybody in ‘The Town’ is beyond gorgeous. Ben Affleck is the one who gets away with it, because his Boston accent is so good. But the crook is absolutely gorgeous. The bank teller is absolutely gorgeous…Jeremy Renner is the least gorgeous guy, and he’s pretty fucking good-looking. Then, if you look at ‘The Fighter,’ and you look at those sisters, they’re just so magnificent. When you see David O. Russell cast those sisters, and you see Ben Affleck cast Blake Lively, you can’t compare the two movies. One just shows how phony the other is.”

  • “Tenet” (2020)

    TENET, from left: John David Washington, Robert Pattinson, 2020. ph: Melinda Sue Gordon / © Warner Bros. / Courtesy Everett Collection
    Image Credit: Melinda Sue Gordon/Warner Bros/Courtesy Everett Collection

    Christopher Nolan’s time-traveling, sci-fi thriller was called a “humorless disappointment” by Mike McCahill in IndieWire’s review. Less pointed with his take (though perhaps that’s even more telling), Tarantino admitted during a podcast appearance in 2020 (h/t Slash Film) that he was utterly baffled by Nolan’s latest. “I think I need to see it again,” the filmmaker laughed.

  • “Stripes” (1981)

    STRIPES, from left: Bill Murray, P.J. Soles, 1981. ©Columbia/courtesy Everett Collection
    Image Credit: ©Columbia Pictures/Courtesy Everett Collection

    Bill Murray may have been a major box office draw in the ’80s and ’90s, but there’s at least one notable audience member he routinely failed to win over.

    In “Cinema Speculation,” Tarantino writes about the frustration he has with Murray’s feel-good films from that era: “Complex characters aren’t necessarily sympathetic. Interesting people aren’t always likable. But in the Hollywood of the eighties, likability was everything.”

    He continued: “If you did make a movie about a fucking bastard, you could bet that fucking bastard would see the error of their ways and be redeemed in the last twenty minutes. Like for example, all of Bill Murray’s characters.”

    Tarantino called out three films specifically; first, Ivan Reitman’s “Stripes.” 

    “How does Murray in ‘Stripes’ go from being an iconoclastic pain in the ass, who deserves to get beat up by Drill Sergeant Warren Oates, to rallying the troops (‘That’s the fact, Jack!’), and masterminding a covert mission on foreign soil?” he complained. “And ‘Stripes’ was one of the hip movies.”

  • “Scrooged” (1988)

    SCROOGED, Bill Murray, 1988, ©Paramount Pictures/courtesy Everett Collection
    Image Credit: ©Paramount/Courtesy Everett Collection

    Continuing with his complaints about Bill Murray protagonists from the ’80s, Tarantino writes in “Cinema Speculation”: “Film critics always preferred Bill Murray to Chevy Chase. Yet, more often than not, Chase remained the same sarcastic aloof asshole at the film’s end he was at the beginning. Or at least his conversion wasn’t the whole point of the movie as it was in ‘Scrooged’ and ‘Groundhog Day.'”

  • “Groundhog Day” (1993)

    GROUNDHOG DAY, Bill Murray, 1993. © Columbia/ courtesy: Everett Collection
    Image Credit: ©Columbia Pictures/Courtesy Everett Collection

    Tarantino finishes his Murray comments for “Cinema Speculation,” writing: “Admittedly, when you don’t give a fuck about other people’s feelings, it probably does wonders for your caustic wit. But I’ve always rejected the idea that Bill Murray’s characters needed redemption. Yeah, maybe he charmed Andie MacDowell [in ‘Groundhog Day’], but does anybody think a less sarcastic Bill Murray is a better Bill Murray?”

  • “The Hunger Games” (2012)

    THE HUNGER GAMES, Jennifer Lawrence, 2012. ph: Murray Close/©Lionsgate/Courtesy Everett Collection
    Image Credit: Murray Close/Lions Gate/Courtesy Everett Collection

    Tarantino famously loves Kinji Fukasaku’s dystopian thriller “Battle Royale,” having repeatedly listed it among his all-time favorite films. It’s no wonder then that the writer/director took a little ire with the remarkably similar “Hunger Games” franchise. 

    “I’m a big fan of the Japanese movie ‘Battle Royale,’ which is what ‘Hunger Games’ was based on,” Tarantino explained in a 2022 appearance on Jimmy Kimmel Live! “Well, ‘Hunger Games’ just ripped it off. That would have been awesome to have directed ‘Battle Royale.’”

  • “Halloween II” (1981)

    HALLOWEEN II, from left: Leo Rossi, Jamie Lee Curtis, Lance Guest, 1981. © Universal Pictures /Courtesy Everett Collection
    Image Credit: ©Universal/Courtesy Everett Collection

    “The sequels were horrible,” Tarantino complained of John Carpenter’s ‘Halloween’ franchise in a 2019 Consequence of Sound interview. “They’re like fruit from a poison tree because Laurie is not the brother of the Shape.” 

    Criticizing the “Halloween II” twist that reveals Michael and Laurie are related, Tarantino said: “It’s horrible that it does that. There’s something far more scary that he’s going through Haddonfield and it’s just her…I think they just yanked some idea out of their ass, alright, and they just talked themselves into ‘Hey, well, this is why…’ and now part two has a reason.”

  • The Marvel Cinematic Universe (2008-present)

    THE AVENGERS, Chris Evans as Captain America, 2012. ph: Zade Rosenthal/©Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures/courtesy Everett Collection
    Image Credit: ©Walt Disney Co./Courtesy Everett Collection

    Joining in Martin Scorsese’s crusade to save cinema, Tarantino recently charged Marvel with the (metaphoric) death of the movie star, though he hedged his comments considerably more than his contemporay. 

    “Part of the Marvel-ization of Hollywood is…you have all these actors who have become famous playing these characters,” Tarantino said in an appearance on the “2 Bears, 1 Cave” podcast. “But they’re not movie stars, right? Captain America is the star. Or Thor is the star. I mean, I’m not the first person to say that. I think that’s been said a zillion times…but it’s like, you know, it’s these franchise characters that become a star.”

    He said of the Marvel Cinematic Universe films: “I don’t love them. No, I don’t. I don’t hate them, alright? But I don’t love them. Right. I mean, look, I used to collect Marvel comics like crazy when I was a kid. There’s an aspect that if these movies were coming out when I was in my twenties, I would totally be fucking happy and totally love them. I mean, they wouldn’t be the only movies being made. They would be those movies amongst other movies. But, you know, I’m almost 60, so yeah. No, I’m not quite as excited about them.”

  • “Star Wars: The Force Awakens – Episode VII” (2015)

    STAR WARS: THE FORCE AWAKENS, (aka STAR WARS: EPISODE VII - THE FORCE AWAKENS), Gwendoline Christie, as Captain Phasma, 2015. ph: David James/©Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures/Lucasfilm Ltd./Courtesy Everett Collection
    Image Credit: David James/Lucasfilm Ltd./Walt Disney Co./Courtesy Everett Collection

    There’s a decent chance Tarantino hasn’t seen “The Force Awakens,” and with good reason. First, the director is a famed “Star Trek” guy. Second, he infamously sparred with Disney in December 2015 when a dispute over theater availability pitted “The Hateful Eight” against the sci-fi sequel from J.J. Abrams.

    “They’ve got the biggest movie in the world. We’re talking about one effing theater,” Tarantino told Howard Stern of the studio’s notoriously heavy-handed approach to securing the Cinerama Dome for “Star Wars” screenings. “It’s vindictive, it’s mean, and it’s extortion. They literally threatened the ArcLight to do this.”

  • “The Matrix Reloaded” (2003)

    THE MATRIX RELOADED, from left: Carrie-Anne Moss, Keanu Reeves, Laurence Fishburne, 2003. © Warner Bros. / courtesy Everett Collection
    Image Credit: ©Warner Bros/Courtesy Everett Collection

    Few would deny the Wachowskis’ “The Matrix” is one of the greatest sci-fi movies ever made. But for Tarantino, the pair of convoluted sequels to follow — “The Matrix Reloaded” and “The Matrix Revolutions” — were less than impressive. 

    “That was the sword of Damocles hanging over our heads,” Tarantino said to Vulture in 2015, regarding the box office battle between “The Matrix Reloaded” and the first “Kill Bill.” “I saw ‘Matrix Reloaded’ at the Chinese Theatre the day it opened, and I walked out of the cinema singing that Jay-Z song [“S. Carter.”] I was like, ‘Bring it the fuck on. I was worried about that?’”

  • “The Matrix Revolutions” (2003)

    THE MATRIX REVOLUTIONS, Mary Alice, Keanu Reeves, 2003, (c) Warner Brothers/courtesy Everett Collection
    Image Credit: ©Warner Bros/Courtesy Everett Collection

    In a 2009 interview with Sky Movies, Tarantino spoke about his 20 favorite films and called out “The Matrix Reloaded” and “The Matrix Revolutions” for losing “The Matrix” its previously high ranking on his list. (He instead listed the sci-fi classic at number 14, per the interview.)

    “There was a time actually that I would have considered ‘Matrix’ the official number two after ‘Battle Royale,'” Tarantino said. “However, I have to say that time was before ‘Matrix 2’ and ‘3’ came out and actually ruined the mythology for me. But even though it did ruin the mythology for me and actually moved the original ‘Matrix’ down on my list — frankly, I just can’t think about it the same way I did before — it didn’t obliterate it entirely.”